Collaborative Membership Programs

Posted by on Feb 23, 2016 in Communication, Donor Cultivation, Featured, Membership, Plans and Budgets, Staff Development, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Collaborative Membership Programs

Collaborative Membership Programs

I recently posed the following question to Land Trust Alliance, Association of Fundraising Professionals, and several different Linked-In fora:

“I am launching a feasibility project to test whether several different organizations with similar missions (land trusts, for example) and separate service territories can work together to increase membership for all. In other words, can they collaboratively negotiate list rental, design, and even mailhouse services to achieve an economy of scale not possible working independently? If you know of something like this being tried before, I’d like to hear from you. Are there examples of similar tests? Success stories? Disasters? I’d even be interested in attempts that were abandoned for any number of reasons. Many thanks for your assistance.”

It turns out that I couldn’t find any stories of good, bad, or ugly collaborative direct mail. I did, however, learn of several things that had been tried.

Judy Anderson at Community Consultants in New York responded that several land trusts in Connecticut are working on a collaborative case statement. Judy also told me she knows of several examples of land trusts using the same staff person to handle their membership programs and direct mail.

Rupert Friday at the Rhode Island Land Trust Council called and talked about an abandoned project in Rhode Island several years ago. The idea was that several different land trusts could merge their membership data into one larger database. The database would be chosen to bring flexibility and services to each land trust superior to that which they would be able to afford on their own. A centralized system could also be reliably backed up, periodically checked for bad addresses, and regularly “serviced” with software updates and so on.

Further, the door would then be open to other collaborative work such as combined renewal programs, standardized newsletter and E-News programs, and other routine communications. Even if the land trusts never collaborated on anything, sharing a database would open the door to shared training and support.

The experiment never really got started. Rupert could not find enough land trust interest to overcome the distrust of how the data might be misused. As it turned out, an even greater impediment was the work involved in standardizing how each land trust’s data was organized.

Beth Hershenhart, founder and CEO of Innovative Resources Group, Inc, emailed me about a collaborative program she has been involved with in New York. Under this program, several organizations (not land trusts) have combined their mailing lists by sending them to a wealth screening organization. The combined lists were enough to make the screening work affordable for all without risking actually sharing each other’s lists.

The organizations then collaborated on the design and production of a direct mail piece featuring basic planned giving information to a smaller group the screening service identified as likely candidates. Though the results may not be known in full for some time, the results have already yielded planned giving leads representing several hundreds of thousands of dollars.

None of these projects was exactly what I was looking for, but each was provocative. Why aren’t there more numerous and better examples of land trusts beginning to collaborate and share services? Where are the barriers? How can we help?

Love to hear your thoughts.

Cheers,

 

-da

 

Photo credit: Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Volunteers at Bow in the Clouds Preserve courtesy of Southwest Michigan Land Conservancy.

* * * * *

 

Fundraiser’s Almanac
Here’s what I’m thinking about for February. What are YOU thinking about?

  • Taking the Time to Write Well – We too often sacrifice quality of writing for quantity and speed. In doing so, communication suffers and we enjoy it less. Email is a burden. Reports are skimmed, if they’re read at all. And everything we produce is high-stress, last minute, eleventh-hour, right before the deadline. We need to anticipate more. Get ahead of the curve. Let our writing steep more. Write in such a way that our audiences will read it. Being more effective communicators.
  • Writing Thank You Letters – Write and design your Thank You letters to be “fridge worthy.”
  • Writing Renewal Letters – Renewal letters are pretty short and sweet. You should plan an initial letter and up to three follow-up letters spaced about 4-5 weeks apart. Because you know already who should be renewing this year and when, and because you can write letters now that will work as first letters the remainder of the year, you could actually produce all your renewal letters for 2016 right now, and get that part over with. Then set them up by date in a box and put them in the mail during the year when the dates come around.
  • Writing Appeal and Recruitment Letters – It’s not too early to start working on ideas for spring and fall appeal content either.

 

* * * * *

 

Will I see you at a conference this spring? This spring I’m heading to state conferences in Wisconsin, Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, New York, and Pennsylvania. I’m also planning to attend the River Rally in Mobile, Alabama.

Will I see you there?